Anrasay

✨ Qué emoción poder escribir esto. ✨

Hace tiempo me hackearon esta página y, aunque llegué a saber quién estuvo detrás de eso, decidí no guardar rencor ni desearle el mal a nadie. Al final, creo firmemente que en esta vida cada quien recibe lo que siembra.

Fueron meses difíciles. Hubo momentos de tristeza, frustración e incertidumbre, pero nunca perdí la fe. Mientras intentaba recuperar este espacio, seguí adelante y construí otra página con mucho trabajo, dedicación y amor.

Hoy, al parecer, esta página vuelve a estar en mis manos. Todavía estoy verificando que todo esté en orden, pero mi corazón está lleno de gratitud.

Primero quiero darle gracias a Dios, porque nunca me soltó de la mano y me dio la fortaleza para seguir cuando parecía que todo estaba perdido. También gracias a todas las personas que me apoyaron, confiaron en mí y siguieron acompañándome en este camino.

Hoy no siento enojo, siento paz. Porque entendí que lo que es para uno, tarde o temprano regresa. 🙏✨💖
Gracias por seguir aquí les mando un fuerte abrazo 🥰

“Death Penalty for Child Rapists Act” — Nancy Mace has introduced a bill stating that those who r**e a child should not get a second chance.
Nancy Mace put it plainly:
“Rape a child and you don’t get a second chance.”
Do you support the death penalty for child rapists?

Sunny Hostin: "I think there are many people who voted for Trump who may now wish Kamala Harris were in the White House."

Discussion of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution in relation to Donald Trump reflects broader questions about constitutional limits and executive accountability. The amendment outlines a formal process in which the vice president and a majority of the cabinet determine a president’s inability to perform their duties. While designed for specific circumstances, its role in public debate highlights ongoing concerns about leadership, governance, and how constitutional mechanisms are interpreted during politically sensitive periods.

Dan Bilzerian has sparked global controversy after making inflammatory remarks about Israelis in a recent public statement. The social media personality suggested using derogatory language to describe the population, prompting immediate backlash across multiple digital platforms.

"I won't work, I cannot work with anyone who justifies or supports gen*cide." — Spanish actor Javier Bardem draws a firm moral line in Hollywood, saying he will refuse to collaborate with those he believes defend ongoing violence. The Oscar winner’s direct statement has sparked strong reactions across the industry, with some praising his willingness to take a public stand, while others argue it brings politics into art and could risk alienating colleagues.
Do you respect his stance?